Mechanical valves offer superior long-term survival for aortic valve replacement patients aged

A study presented at the 2025 Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) Annual Meeting reveals that mechanical aortic valve replacements (AVRs) provide significant long-term survival benefits for patients aged 60 and younger compared to bioprosthetic valves.

The study, leveraging data from the STS Adult Cardiac Surgery Database (ACSD), offers the most comprehensive analysis to date of prosthetic valve outcomes, encompassing over 100,000 patients.

The study addressed a critical question in cardiac surgery: how age and valve type influence outcomes for patients undergoing surgical AVR. It found that patients aged 60 and younger had lower all-cause mortality with mechanical valves.

Key findings include:

• Decline in mechanical valve use: Despite superior outcomes in younger populations, mechanical valve use decreased from 20% to 10% over the study’s 12-year period.
• Survival advantage: Mechanical valves were independently associated with a lower risk of all-cause mortality in patients 60 years or younger.
• Robust methodology: The study utilized comprehensive patient-level data from the STS ACSD and the National Death Index, ensuring precise, validated insights.

“The decision between a bioprosthetic and a mechanical valve is one of the most consequential for patients requiring aortic valve replacement,” said Dr. Michael Bowdish, lead author of the study and a cardiothoracic surgeon at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center in Los Angeles.

“Our research underscores that for patients with an age threshold of 60 years, mechanical valves confer a significant survival advantage. This data will help patients and providers make more informed choices about their care.”

This study also highlights how advancements in surgical techniques and data analytics are improving the ability to tailor treatment plans to individual patients.

“By linking the STS database with the National Death Index, we have a powerful tool to analyze long-term outcomes, paving the way for more personalized and effective care,” Dr. Bowdish added.

The findings are particularly relevant considering the increasing adoption of bioprosthetic surgical valves in many patients and the recent trend of bioprosthetic transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in younger populations without clear evidence.

The current study challenges this practice trend given this important evidence favoring the durability and survival benefits of mechanical valves in patients aged 60 and younger.

Provided by
The Society of Thoracic Surgeons