Thursday, November 21, 2024
Home Oncology & Cancer Medical field should address uncertainty for cancer patients under active surveillance

Medical field should address uncertainty for cancer patients under active surveillance

by Medical Xpress
0 comment


Credit: Pixabay/CC0 Public Domain

Patients with low-risk cancers undergoing active surveillance face a favorable long-term prognosis. David Haggstrom, M.D., MAS, makes the case that it’s time for the medical field to help manage the anxiety caused by waiting.

Dr. Haggstrom, a physician-researcher with Regenstrief Institute, the Veterans Administration Medical Center in Indianapolis and the Indiana University School of Medicine, is lead author of a Viewpoint article, published in JAMA Oncology, presenting the case for interventions designed to reduce the anxiety related to cancer monitoring.

Medical research increasingly shows that observation—known as —can be a reasonable approach to monitoring low-risk cancers in cases where treatment confers little or no benefit. While this strategy can avoid unnecessary interventions, it can also create significant anxiety for patients.

“Cancer elicits fear, regardless of the disease’s severity. While observation is appropriate for certain types of cancer, like early prostate or , the problem of uncertainty and stress remains after being labeled with a . There is even a name for the anxiety around the time of a follow-up , called scanxiety,” said Dr. Haggstrom.

No amount of information about the prognosis of a low-risk cancer can eliminate uncertainty, which can produce a variety of negative responses, including perceptions of vulnerability, feelings of fear and a propensity to avoid decision-making. Dr. Haggstrom suggests several potential interventions for consideration:

  • Cognitive behavioral therapy
  • Acceptance and commitment therapy
  • Mindfulness meditation programs
  • Patient decision aids
  • Clinical decision support tools

In addition to testing interventions, future research should focus on understanding how uncertainty leads to . Long-term studies are needed to track how patient responses to uncertainty change over time, especially given the extended lifespans of many patients under observation.

“Health care should be patient-centered and account for any distress among patients caused by the tests they receive. While surveillance intervals may be long, once a cancer diagnosis is made, patients still live with that knowledge every day,” said Dr. Haggstrom.

More information:
David A. Haggstrom et al, Active Surveillance for Low-Risk Cancer—The Waiting Is the Hardest Part, JAMA Oncology (2024). DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2024.2667

Citation:
Waiting is the hardest part: Medical field should address uncertainty for cancer patients under active surveillance (2024, September 16)
retrieved 16 September 2024
from https://medicalxpress.com/news/2024-09-hardest-medical-field-uncertainty-cancer.html

This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no
part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.





Source link

You may also like

Leave a Comment

Edtior's Picks

Latest Articles

All Rights reserved, site designed by Yellohost.co.za